How to Choose the Best System Integrator for Your Material Handling Project (Compared)

Selecting a system integrator determines how effectively a material handling project moves from concept to production. The selection affects controls architecture, conveyor performance, operator access, documentation, commissioning, maintenance, and future expansion.

A qualified integrator should address the complete control system: not isolated programming tasks. Evaluation should cover:

  • Material handling experience
  • Conveyor control engineering
  • PLC and HMI platforms
  • Electrical panel design
  • Safety systems
  • Network and software integration
  • Project execution
  • Commissioning
  • Long-term support

Conveying Controls L.L.C. provides electrical control systems for conveyor and material handling applications, including full system concept and design, procurement and specification services, schematic drawings, FLA calculations, PLC-based controls, HMI platforms, and customer support. With more than 35 years of experience, the company supports projects from initial concept through system delivery.

DEFINE THE PROJECT SCOPE

Begin the comparison before requesting proposals. Each integrator should receive the same project information.

Document the following:

  • Conveyor types
  • Conveyor lengths and elevations
  • Product dimensions and weights
  • Required throughput
  • Accumulation requirements
  • Sortation requirements
  • Motor quantities and horsepower
  • Existing PLC and HMI platforms
  • Facility electrical requirements
  • Network requirements
  • Safety requirements
  • WMS, ERP, or production-system interfaces
  • Expansion requirements
  • Required production date

A project brief prevents incomplete proposals. It also allows each integrator to identify design constraints before pricing and scheduling.

A greenfield installation may require complete controls architecture, panel construction, field wiring, and commissioning. A retrofit may require PLC migration, HMI replacement, field-device compatibility, and phased installation around active production.

The selected integrator should have experience with the specific project condition.

COMPARE MATERIAL HANDLING EXPERIENCE

General automation experience does not automatically equal material handling expertise. Conveyor systems require coordinated control of motors, sensors, zones, merges, transfers, accumulation logic, diverters, and emergency-stop circuits.

Request project examples involving:

  • Conveyor lines
  • Distribution centers
  • Manufacturing plants
  • Case handling
  • Pallet handling
  • Sortation
  • Accumulation
  • Packaging interfaces
  • Conveyor retrofits
  • Multi-zone control systems

Review the scope of each reference project. A supplier that only programs a PLC may not provide the electrical engineering, panel design, field integration, or commissioning required for a complete system.

A true material handling system integrator should coordinate the interaction between mechanical equipment, electrical controls, operator interfaces, safety devices, and facility systems. Integrated-system providers commonly distinguish turnkey project execution from equipment-only supply. The Integrated Systems overview from Conveyor Handling Company provides an example of this project model.

EVALUATE PLC ENGINEERING

The PLC controls the operating sequence and coordinates the equipment. Poor PLC structure creates maintenance delays, troubleshooting difficulty, and future modification risk.

Request information about:

  • PLC manufacturer and platform
  • Processor capacity
  • I/O architecture
  • Remote I/O requirements
  • Industrial Ethernet or fieldbus network
  • Program structure
  • Tag naming standards
  • Alarm logic
  • Fault recovery
  • Manual and automatic operating modes
  • Version control
  • Backup procedures
  • Source-code delivery
  • Documentation standards

The integrator should explain how the program will control conveyor zones, detect jams, manage accumulation, coordinate product transfers, and restart equipment after a fault.

The proposal should also identify the party responsible for PLC programming, electrical design, panel construction, field installation, and startup. Responsibilities divided between multiple vendors require formal coordination.

Conveying Controls focuses on PLC-based platforms for conveyor and machine control systems. The scope can include control concept development, control wiring schematics, component specifications, procurement support, and system documentation.

REVIEW HMI DESIGN AND DIAGNOSTICS

The HMI is the primary operating and diagnostic interface. A functional HMI should provide direct access to machine status and fault information.

Evaluate the proposed HMI design for:

  • Conveyor status
  • Motor status
  • Zone status
  • Sensor status
  • Active alarms
  • Alarm history
  • Fault location
  • Manual controls
  • Reset functions
  • Maintenance screens
  • User permissions
  • Production counters
  • System modes
  • Network status

Ask the integrator to demonstrate a typical alarm sequence. The demonstration should show how an operator identifies the affected zone, confirms the fault, and returns the system to operation.

Avoid HMI designs that display only generic messages such as “Conveyor Fault.” The interface should identify the equipment, condition, and required maintenance action when possible.

HMI standards should be defined before programming begins. Late-stage screen changes can affect testing, operator training, and commissioning schedules.

ASSESS ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND PANEL CAPABILITY

The control panel houses the equipment that powers and controls the system. Panel layout affects heat management, maintenance access, troubleshooting time, and future modifications.

Request the following deliverables:

  • Electrical schematics
  • Panel layout drawings
  • Power distribution drawings
  • Control circuit drawings
  • I/O schedules
  • Terminal schedules
  • Network drawings
  • Wire numbers
  • Component lists
  • Spare-parts lists
  • FLA calculations
  • Panel test documentation

Review panel construction examples for:

  • Wire organization
  • Component labeling
  • Terminal accessibility
  • Circuit protection
  • Drive spacing
  • Cooling provisions
  • Separation of power and control wiring
  • Spare capacity
  • Documentation storage

Conveying Controls provides schematic drawings for machine control wiring, conveyor control wiring, and panel control wiring. FLA calculations and special project requests can be incorporated into the design process.

CONFIRM SAFETY ENGINEERING

Safety requirements must be included in the initial design. Retrofitting safety devices after controls development can create schedule changes and unplanned field work.

Discuss:

  • Emergency-stop circuits
  • Guard-door interlocks
  • Pull-cord switches
  • Light curtains
  • Safety relays
  • Safety PLC requirements
  • Reset locations
  • Lockout/tagout access
  • Safety zones
  • Restart prevention
  • Risk-assessment responsibilities
  • Validation documentation

Clarify which party supplies safety devices and which party develops the control logic. Confirm how safety circuits interact with conveyor zones, drives, motors, and upstream or downstream equipment.

The project documentation should identify safety devices by location and function. Operators and maintenance personnel require clear procedures for reset, inspection, and restart.

REVIEW INTEGRATION REQUIREMENTS

Material handling automation frequently connects to other systems. The controls integrator should define the interface between the conveyor system and external equipment or software.

Potential interfaces include:

  • WMS
  • WES
  • ERP
  • Barcode scanners
  • Vision systems
  • Robotics
  • Packaging equipment
  • Production systems
  • Building systems
  • Remote monitoring platforms

Ask for the proposed communication method, data ownership, interface testing process, and fault-handling procedure.

The integrator should identify:

  • Required data points
  • Message structure
  • Network responsibilities
  • Interface testing dates
  • Simulation requirements
  • Communication-loss behavior
  • Recovery procedures
  • Cybersecurity responsibilities

A controls system should continue to operate in a defined state when communication with an external system is interrupted. The recovery sequence should be tested before production release.

COMPARE PROJECT EXECUTION

Technical capability is only one selection factor. Project execution determines whether the design reaches production according to the required schedule.

Request a project plan containing:

  • Design milestones
  • Submittal dates
  • Drawing-review dates
  • Procurement dates
  • Panel-build dates
  • Factory acceptance testing
  • Installation dates
  • Field checkout
  • Commissioning
  • Operator training
  • Documentation delivery
  • Warranty start date

Identify the project manager and technical lead. Confirm the communication frequency and format for schedule updates, risks, submittals, change orders, and open issues.

The integrator should define the factory acceptance test before the test occurs. FAT procedures may include I/O verification, motor rotation, safety-circuit testing, alarm testing, HMI review, network checks, and sequence testing.

VERIFY SUPPORT AND DOCUMENTATION

Material handling systems require support after startup. Evaluate the integrator’s post-installation process before contract award.

Confirm availability of:

  • Remote technical support
  • On-site service
  • Spare parts
  • PLC backups
  • HMI backups
  • Electrical drawings
  • Network documentation
  • Training
  • Preventive maintenance guidance
  • Software-change support
  • System expansion support

Define response times, support hours, escalation procedures, and warranty coverage.

Documentation should be delivered in usable formats. Include final PLC programs, HMI files, as-built drawings, manuals, component lists, network diagrams, and test records.

USE A WEIGHTED COMPARISON MATRIX

Use the same scoring system for each finalist. A five-point scale provides a simple comparison.

Evaluation Category Suggested Weight
Material handling experience 20%
PLC and HMI capability 20%
Electrical engineering and panel design 15%
Safety and network integration 10%
Project management 15%
Commissioning and testing 10%
Service and documentation 10%

Score each integrator against documented requirements. Do not allow a low initial price to offset missing controls scope, incomplete documentation, or limited support.

Compare total project value, including:

  • Engineering
  • Components
  • Panel construction
  • Programming
  • Installation
  • Commissioning
  • Training
  • Spares
  • Warranty
  • Future modifications

SELECT THE INTEGRATOR THAT OWNS THE CONTROL RESULT

The best system integrator is not necessarily the lowest bidder. Selection should prioritize relevant experience, defined responsibility, maintainable controls, complete documentation, and reliable support.

Before award, confirm that the integrator can:

  • Design the control concept
  • Develop the PLC architecture
  • Configure the HMI
  • Produce electrical schematics
  • Specify and procure components
  • Build or coordinate control panels
  • Integrate conveyor equipment
  • Test safety circuits
  • Complete commissioning
  • Train operating personnel
  • Support future changes

Conveying Controls L.L.C. applies more than 35 years of conveyor and material handling experience to PLC- and HMI-based control projects. Review the available services at www.conveyingcontrols.com, define the project requirements, and request a structured controls evaluation.

COMPARE. DEFINE. VERIFY. SELECT.

© 2026 Conveying Controls L.L.C. All Rights Reserved.